Agenda item

Lead Councillor Question Session

A question session with the Lead Councillor for Environment.

 

Councillor James Steel’s areas of responsibility include: Waste, Licensing (including Health and Safety regulation), Parking, Parks and Leisure, Arts and Tourism, Bereavement, and Environmental Health and Protection.

 

Minutes:

The Chairman welcomed the Lead Councillor for Environment and reminded the meeting of Councillor Steel’s areas of responsibility: Waste, Licensing (including Health and Safety regulation), Parking, Parks and Leisure, Arts and Tourism, Bereavement, and Environmental Health and Protection.  The Chairman advised that the Lead Councillor for Environment had been informed of several potential question areas in advance of the meeting and that other question areas and specific queries would arise.

The following information and responses were provided during the ensuing discussion:

 

  • In reply to questions about the Visit Surrey website, the Lead Councillor for Environment advised that Visit Surrey continued to be the top performing website for the visitor economy for Surrey.  The Lead Councillor for Environment informed the meeting that many tourism or visitor economy businesses were working already with Visit Surrey and that the Council working with Visit Surrey avoided duplication of information and resources for businesses.  In addition, the meeting was informed that by using Visit Surrey the Council benefited from the use of campaigns managed centrally by Visit Britain and Visit England. 

 

  • The Lead Councillor for Environment indicated that the Council did not have feedback from residents concerning the Council’s collaboration with Visit Surrey.  He advised that ninety percent of people using the Visit Surrey website came from near-neighbour counties.  The Committee was advised of the top Guildford-related webpages viewed on Visit Surrey since February 2022: the landing page; Shere; Newlands Corner; the paddling pool; the Lido; and the Jubilee page. 

 

  • In reply to questions, the Lead Councillor for Environment advised that it was not possible to measure the number of businesses taking up the free advertising events listing offered on the Visit Surrey website.  The meeting was informed that the Council’s web team were producing a video on Guildford for use on the Visit Surrey website.  A member of the Committee suggested the value of measuring the effectiveness and value of the Visit Surrey website to Guildford businesses as the website continued to develop.

 

  • In response to a query from a member of the Committee and with reference to the large number of questions to be put forward during the item, the Chairman noted the advantages of succinct answers during the Lead Councillor question session and the value of circulating fuller details to Committee members after the meeting. 

 

  • In reply to a question, the Lead Councillor for Environment indicated that Guildford had a dedicated section of the Visit Surrey website.  A member of the Committee asked if the Council would be promoting the Guildford dedicated section of the Visit Surrey website.  In reply, the Lead Councillor for Environment indicated queries would be directed to the appropriate part of the Visit Surrey website.

 

  • In response to questions about the Council’s waste and recycling fleet, the Lead Councillor for Environment advised the meeting that the Council was monitoring the development of electric vehicle and hydrogen trucks.  He advised that power infrastructure limitations at the Council’s current depot limited its ability to purchase larger electric vehicles, although planned electric vehicle infrastructure at the new depot would help a more rapid replacement of diesel with electric vehicle trucks.  The meeting was informed that four dustcarts were needed this year and there was sufficient power and some funding to support these as electric vehicles. 

 

  • In reply to a question, the Lead Councillor for Environment advised that it was not possible at the current stage to state with accuracy the cost implications of making the whole waste and recycling fleet either electric vehicle or hydrogen. 

 

  • A member of the Committee asked about the conversion of the waste and recycling fleet to use hydrogenated vegetable oil.  The Executive Head of Environmental Services advised that the benefits and costs of such a change were being examined at Waverley Borough Council and a similar exercise could be undertaken at Guildford Borough Council.

 

  • A member of the Committee asked how the national waste strategy would affect the Council and the Borough.  In response, the Lead Councillor for Environment indicated that the government had not finalised their plans and that the implications for residents and Council operations would be dependent on these plans and associated legislation.  In response to further questions about the practicalities and requirement for residents to store wheelie bins and containers, the Executive Head of Environmental Services indicated that recycling was planned on a property level across the Borough. 

 

  • In reply to a question on the running of G-Live, the Lead Councillor for Environment advised the Committee of a change in the venue director, recovering audience numbers, and the effect of the pandemic on the venue’s programme. 

 

  • The Lead Councillor for Environment advised the Committee of actions taken relating to chemical reduction measures and a pesticide-free Guildford, including implementation of a programme of chemical-free playground maintenance, the trialling of chemical-free maintenance of hard surface areas, and work with Guildford Environmental Forum and other volunteers. 

 

  • In reply to a question about identified areas of concern within his portfolio, the Lead Councillor for Environment referred to the increased cost of utility bills at leisure venues, the limited staff resources for the Council’s parks, and the potential implications of the national waste strategy.  In response to a follow-up question from a Committee member, the Head of Culture, Heritage and Leisure Services indicated that the challenge of resources was across all Council departments and not all service levels were likely to be maintained. 

 

  • The Lead Councillor for Environment advised the meeting that all aspects of on-street parking would be managed directly by Surrey County Council from April 2023 and that decision-making for on-street parking had been removed from the Joint Committees earlier in the year.  The Deputy Leader of the Council and Lead Councillor for Governance indicated the need for a governance process between the Council and Surrey County Council to ensure the change in on-street parking arrangements did not lead to divergence in on and off-street parking and enforcement policies.  In addition, he highlighted the issue of park and ride arrangements.  A member of the Committee referred to the difficulty of progressing on-street parking reviews in the period before management reverted to Surrey County Council in April 2023.

 

  • In reply to a question on feedback from visitors, residents, or shopkeepers about car park charges, the Executive Head of Environmental Services referred to the high and steady usage by visitors of the Borough’s car parks.  The Deputy Leader of the Council and Lead Councillor for Governance noted the policy tensions of income generation from Council car parks alongside support for high street businesses through the provision of affordable car parking, together with disincentivising short journeys and encouraging use of park and ride, and the cost of living crisis. 

 

  • A member of the Committee expressed concern at the probable effect on air quality from the park and ride service no longer operating at the Onslow and Spectrum sites.  In response, the Lead Councillor for Environment indicated that the sites were dependent on Surrey County Council securing an operator.

 

  • In reply to a query about anti-idling, the Lead Councillor for Environment advised that there was nothing in the current licence conditions with regard to taxis or private hire vehicles leaving engines idling when stationary.  He suggested that officers would remind taxi and private hire drivers of the Highway Code requirement not to leave a vehicle engine running unnecessarily while the vehicle was stationary on a public road. 

 

The Chairman thanked the Lead Councillor for Environment and officers for attending and answering questions and noted that the briefing notes provided to the Lead Councillor for Environment would be circulated to Committee members.