Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 19/02/2024
Effective from: 08/02/2024
Decision:
Direct Award of contract to Lambert Smith
Hampton for marketing and lettings of The Billings vacant
offices.
Wards affected: Stoke;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regulatory Services
Decision published: 15/02/2024
Effective from: 14/02/2024
Decision:
To extend the contract for agency staff in the
Compliance Team dealing with Private Sector Housing Enforcement, to
backfill resources whilst the team continues to support the work
for the Homes for Ukraine scheme. The Homes for Ukraine (H4U)
budget is being used for this ECF (below) - ECF reference is
EC100859. budget owner is Samantha Hutchinson. This has been
approved as part of ECF process. ECF:
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Richard Homewood
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 31/01/2024 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 14/02/2024
Effective from: 31/01/2024
Decision:
Councillor Howard Smith left the meeting for the duration of the consideration of this application owing to the non-pecuniary interest he declared.
The Committee considered the above-mentioned full application for erection of a detached two-storey dwelling following demolition of the existing dwelling and widening of the existing access.
Prior to the consideration of the application, the following persons addressed the Committee with Public Speaking Procedure Rules 3(b):
· Reverend Peter Levell (to object);
· Mr Paul Banwell (to object) and;
· Mr Philip Andrews (Agent) (in support)
The Committee received a presentation from the Senior Planning Officer, Sakina Khanbhai. The Committee noted that the application site was located in the urban area and situated towards the upper end of The Mount. The existing dwelling was located on the northern side of the road which was set back and positioned on elevated land from the street level. The plot was much wider than the neighbouring residential plot. The surrounding area was comprised of a mix of dwelling styles. The proposal was 14.8 metres wide and 10 metres deep with a height of 7.32 metres.
The design proposed had been revised from an earlier withdrawn scheme with a first-floor layout so that the bathrooms were located to the rear of the dwelling with obscure glazing. The dwelling would also be narrower than the existing dwelling with generous separation distances to neighbouring side boundaries.
The proposed dwelling would be slightly deeper than the existing by 2.3 metres and narrower. The existing access would also be widened, and sufficient parking spaces provided for two vehicles within the existing parking area to the front of the dwelling.
The proposal was for a contemporary design with a simplified gable front which previously included a large amount of glazing to the rear of the property that was now obscure glazed. The height of the proposed dwelling was also broadly in line with the existing.
The application was therefore recommended for approval with the proposed conditions as outlined in the report and updated conditions in the supplementary late sheets.
The Committee discussed the application and noted that the proposed huf house was not out of character with the existing neighbouring properties given there was no uniformity in the overall design employed in the neighbourhood. In addition, there was already a huf house located further up the road which fitted in well. Concerns raised regarding overlooking at the back of the property would be successfully overcome via the proposed obscured glass. In relation to concerns regarding an increase in on-road parking, the property did have a forecourt and so provision was made already. If the residents did wish to park their cars on-road they would have to apply to the Surrey Highway Authority. With regard to concerns raised regarding the development representing a form of over-development, the Committee noted that the footprint of the proposal was largely similar to the existing property. Whilst it was deeper, it would not be seen from the road or from the rear. The proposed roof line would be higher than the existing property but was largely the same as the property to the left. The Committee also commended the eco-design methods incorporated which included triple glazing, water efficiency measures and solar panels.
The Committee noted further comments in support of the application that Guildford did not have a predominant architectural style. The fact that the huf design was different to conventional houses did not mean that it was harmful.
The Committee noted comments that the proposal did not comply with Policy D1 of the Local Plan Strategy and Sites, as far as there was a distinctive local character. The design also failed to comply with policies D4 and D5 of the Local Plan, development management policies which required any building to enhance its surroundings, which it was felt this proposal did not. The development was also overbearing and dominant in the street scene.
A motion was moved and seconded to approve the application which was carried.
RECORDED VOTE LIST
|
||||
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
1 |
Lizzie Griffiths |
X |
|
|
2 |
Richard Mills |
X |
|
|
3 |
Dominique Williams |
X |
|
|
4 |
Maddy Redpath |
X |
|
|
5 |
Joanne Shaw |
X |
|
|
6 |
Patrick Oven |
|
X |
|
7 |
Vanessa King |
X |
|
|
8 |
Sue Wyeth-Price |
X |
|
|
9 |
Cait Taylor |
X |
|
|
10 |
Yves de Contades |
X |
|
|
11 |
James Jones |
X |
|
|
12 |
Stephen Hives |
X |
|
|
13 |
David Bilbé |
X |
|
|
14 |
Bob Hughes |
X |
|
|
|
TOTALS |
13 |
1 |
0 |
In conclusion, having taken consideration of the representations received in relation to the application, the Committee
RESOLVED to approve application 23/P/01085 subject to the conditions and reasons as detailed in the report and additional conditions as detailed below:
1) The development should be carried out in accordance with the submitted Preliminary Ecological Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain report prepared by Ecology & Habitat Management Ltd and the recommendations set out within Table 6 and Section 6.3 of this document.
Reason: To mitigate against the loss of existing biodiversity and nature habitats.
2) No development shall take place until a Biodiversity Enhancement Plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.
The approved details should include measures to enhance the nature conservation interest of the site.
Reason: To increase the biodiversity of the site and mitigate any impact from the development.
3) Before any other works in association with restoration of the land are commenced, the Cotoneaster present on the site as stated in the Preliminary Ecological Assessment and Biodiversity Net Gain report which is listed as an invasive species under Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside act 1991, shall be eradicated using qualified and experienced contractors and disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act (Duty of Care regulations 1991 and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved in writing prior to the commencement of the above ground works.
Reason: To ensure the cotoneaster is eradicated in the interests of the natural habitat of the area, to prevent the spread of cotoneaster in the wider area and in the interests of residential amenities, in compliance with good practice.
Informatives:
1. The applicant should take action to ensure that development activities such as demolition and vegetation or site clearance are timed to avoid the bird nesting season of early March to August inclusive.
2. The applicant is advised that the submitted Preliminary Ecological Appraisal also notes that there are Cheryl Laurel and Buddleia are present on site and although not listed as an invasive species in Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 these are non-native invasive plants and should be eradicated from the site by a suitable qualified professional.
Wards affected: Onslow;
Decision Maker: Joint Strategic Director - Place
Decision published: 14/02/2024
Effective from: 14/02/2024
Decision:
To enter into a Funding agreement with SCC in
alignment with the funding reported to Council on 16th March
2023.
Wards affected: Ash South; Ash Vale; Ash Wharf;
Lead officer: Dawn Hudd
Decision Maker: Joint Strategic Director - Place
Decision published: 13/02/2024
Effective from: 19/02/2024
Decision:
To approve the sale of the land and buildings
at 39, 39.5, 40, 40a and 42 Castle Street and 53 Quarry Street,
Guildford in line with the following terms and conditions:
Freehold to be sold at Savills auction.
The assets do not pass the Council’s investment criteria and
are subject to ongoing repair liability and limited reletting
prospects without considerable capital expenditure.
In accordance with the Council’s General Disposal Consent
powers, the proposed disposal is to be by way of public auction
with the guide and reserve prices to be set in advance which will
provide the ‘best consideration reasonably
obtainable’.
Each party will bear their own costs in relation to the sale.
Wards affected: Castle;
Lead officer: Dawn Hudd
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 12/02/2024
Effective from: 12/02/2024
Decision:
The Council’s tenant (Surrey County
Council) of the above property has requested that they be given
licence to allow the surrender of the Lockwood Centre, 9-13
Westfield Road, Guildford.
For a surrender: GBC to surrender the lease with Surrey County
Council who have deemed the property to be surplus to their
requirements. Terms are agreed for the lease to be surrendered
based on GBC receiving a premium sum of £162,000 plus VAT
(equivalent to three years rent). Post surrender GBC intends to let
the property (initially most likely as open storage) after
demolishing the buildings and securing the necessary planning
consent.
Wards affected: Bellfields & Slyfield;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 12/02/2024
Effective from: 08/02/2024
Decision:
To appoint the lowest price surveyors for the
valuation of Eastgate Court at 195-205 High St in
Guildford
Wards affected: Castle;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regulatory Services
Decision published: 12/02/2024
Effective from: 12/02/2024
Decision:
The Safer Street Fund launched in 2020 to
allow Local Authorities and Police forces to bid for funding to
provide measures proven to prevent neighbourhood crime, including
CCTV, street lighting, alleygating and improving the security of
properties at risk of neighbourhood crime.
Funding was also available to schemes delivering other
interventions aimed at changing attitudes and behaviours in
relation to Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) in the public
domain through educational activities and behavioural change
programmes. The focus will also be on the night-time economy and
working with local businesses to keep women safe and raise
awareness of VAWG in local pubs and bars.
In September 2023 Surrey Police were successful in securing funding
for initiatives for delivering a range of interventions in
Guildford to tackle Anti-Social Behaviour and VAWG over the period
from 1 October 2023 to 31 March 2025 through public realm
improvements and the provisions of a Street Marshalling
Service.
In December 2023 the Police asked Regulatory Services to secure the
Street Marshalling Service as they wished to separate the service
from Policing.
£85,868 of the Safer Streets fund has been allocated to the
Marshalling project, including £4k equipment costs.
Allocation of the funding for Marshalling Services will be provided
to the Council by the Police for GBC to manage the contract.
Marshals will work in partnership with GBC services, Surrey Police
and the Experience Guildford BID with the aim of creating a town
wide resource provision that can be deployed at busy times to areas
at a time it is needed to support the response to Anti-Social
Behaviour.
To ensure the most effective use of funding, the Marshals would be
deployed in an intelligence fashion across the town to work in
areas where they can be most effective and with a focus on
engagement and enforcement of PSPO provisions, Anti-Social
Behaviour and other environmental offences to improve the public
realm.
The role of marshals is to engage, explain, encourage and secure
compliance by providing a visible and supportive reassuring
presence. However, we have to accept that their role and the advice
being offered may not always be welcomed by the public or
operators. There is a risk that certain groups and individuals will
be upset at best and at worst become abusive. There may also be a
demand for deployment of Marshals in certain areas at certain times
creating potential conflict on demand.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Richard Homewood
Decision Maker: Joint Strategic Director - Community and Wellbeing
Decision published: 12/02/2024
Effective from: 12/02/2024
Decision:
Contract award for Madlins to provide
Professional Contract Management Services to assist in the delivery
of GBC's Fire Door replacement programme
Wards affected: Stoke;
Lead officer: Annie Righton
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Planning Development
Decision published: 09/02/2024
Effective from: 09/02/2024
Decision:
Transfer of Guildford Borough Councils Local
Land Charges Register to HM Land Registry.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Claire Upton-Brown
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regeneration and Planning Policy
Decision published: 07/02/2024
Effective from: 07/02/2024
Decision:
Appointment of Airey Miller to carry out multi
disciplinary services including project management, quantity
surveying, structural, civil and services engineering and
overheating analysis for the HRA Small Site at 108
Georgelands.
Initial contract value of £25,831.40+VAT
Wards affected: Send & Lovelace;
Lead officer: Abi Lewis
Decision Maker: Lead Specialist for ICT
Decision published: 06/02/2024
Effective from: 06/02/2024
Decision:
Procurement of an IT Health Check (ITHC)
in-line with Public Sector Network (PSN) compliance requirements
and a non-exclusive arrangement to support IT web service
vulnerability scans in the following 12-months (capped by
value).
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: James Beach
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regeneration and Planning Policy
Decision published: 06/02/2024
Effective from: 06/02/2024
Decision:
To authorise the signing of the access
agreement to enable the use of the Barnet framework.
Wards affected: Bellfields & Slyfield;
Lead officer: Abi Lewis
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regeneration and Planning Policy
Decision published: 06/02/2024
Effective from: 06/02/2024
Decision:
To allow GBC to enter into a contract with PWC
to carry out an appraisal of potential financing options for the
Weyside Urban Village Programme.
Wards affected: Bellfields & Slyfield;
Lead officer: Abi Lewis
Decision Maker: Parks and Countryside Development Lead
Decision published: 06/02/2024
Effective from: 06/02/2024
Decision:
Issue contract to
Reeds Ltd
for
Works: To crush and re-surface track at Pilgrims Way to Chantry
Wood, Guildford
Cost: £8,825
Wards affected: Castle;
Lead officer: Hendryk Jurk
Decision Maker: Joint Strategic Director Legal and Democratic Services (Monitoring Officer)
Decision published: 06/02/2024
Effective from: 06/02/2024
Decision:
To review and amend certain dates in the
published timetable in regard to the Planning Committee to ensure a
4-week cycle. To make minor adjustments to the committee dates for
the efficient progress of the budget papers for 2025. To ensure
full coordination with the final Waverley Borough Council timetable
for 2024-25.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Susan Sale
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regeneration and Planning Policy
Decision published: 05/02/2024
Effective from: 05/02/2024
Decision:
Extension of scope to existing Airey Miller
appointment to include overheating analysis, civil engineering and
utility applications at the following HRA Small Sites:
- Land adjacent to 21-23 Dunmore
- Land adjacent to 27 Broomfield
- 17 Wharf Lane
The initial contract value of this additional work is
£14,346+VAT
Wards affected: Send & Lovelace; Westborough;
Lead officer: Abi Lewis
Decision Maker: Joint Strategic Director - Place
Decision published: 05/02/2024
Effective from: 02/02/2024
Decision:
Direct award appointment for an NEC
Supervisor.
Wards affected: Bellfields & Slyfield; Burpham;
Lead officer: Dawn Hudd
Decision Maker: Head of Financial Services and S151 Officer
Decision published: 05/02/2024
Effective from: 05/02/2024
Decision:
To enter into a contract with Grant Thornton
in respect of Housing RTB Annual Audit £10,000.00
Lead officer: Richard Bates
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regeneration and Planning Policy
Decision published: 05/02/2024
Effective from: 05/02/2024
Decision:
Appointment of Consult Communications to
provide public engagement services at the HRA Small Site at Manor
House Flats.
Initial contract value of £11,440+VAT
Wards affected: Pilgrims;
Lead officer: Abi Lewis
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 02/02/2024
Effective from: 02/02/2024
Decision:
To provide agency services to market vacant
industrial unit following forfeiture of lease relating to former
tenant.
Wards affected: Bellfields & Slyfield;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden
Decision Maker: Lead Specialist for ICT
Decision published: 02/02/2024
Effective from: 02/02/2024
Decision:
Procurement of mobile telephony services from
BT PLC, to supply mobile telephony connections for the
Council.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: James Beach
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 02/02/2024
Effective from: 02/02/2024
Decision:
N/A
Wards affected: Stoke;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden
Decision Maker: Head of Asset Management
Decision published: 01/02/2024
Effective from: 26/01/2024
Decision:
To approve the grant of a new lease of unit 16
Midleton Enterprise Park.
Wards affected: Westborough;
Lead officer: Francesca Kosh
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Housing Services
Decision published: 01/02/2024
Effective from: 08/02/2024
Decision:
Award lots 1 - 7 on day to day housing repairs
procured tenders.
lot 1 External works east and west
lot 2 larger works east and west
lot 3 electrical
lot 4 Glazing
lot 5 plastering
lot 6 roofing
lot 7 decorating.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Paul Puttock
Decision Maker: Joint Strategic Director - Community and Wellbeing
Decision published: 01/02/2024
Effective from: 31/01/2024
Decision:
The Council is the freehold owner of a block of flats known as 124
and 138A Carfax Avenue Tongham. Flat 128 was originally sold 22
February 2016 under the provisions of the Right to Buy for a term
of 125 years from 1 July 1985 and at a ground rent of £10.
The lessee served a notice on the Council in accordance with the
Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act requesting an
extension of the term of the lease to make it more saleable on the
open market. The sale progressed and the notice to extend the term
was assigned to the new owner. Under the legislation, the Council
as the competent landlord, is required to grant a new lease to the
owner of the flat for an additional term of 90 years on top of the
unexpired term of the lease, and on the same terms as the existing
lease, save that the annual ground rent will be a peppercorn if
demanded.
The consideration for a new lease is governed by the legislation
and determined by valuers. The lessee will be required to pay all
of the Council’s legal and surveyors costs
Wards affected: Ash South;
Lead officer: Siobhan Rumble
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Regeneration and Planning Policy
Decision published: 01/02/2024
Effective from: 01/02/2024
Decision:
The Council requires an S123 valuation to
confirm the sale of its land to the east of Blackwell Farm
Guildford.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Abi Lewis
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 31/01/2024
Effective from: 20/01/2024
Decision:
To approve the reviewed rent of the above
property leased to South Eastern Power Networks plc (UKPN).
In accordance with the provisions of clause 5 of the lease dated 25
March 2014, the passing rent of £471pa has been reviewed, and
it is proposed to increase it to £625.03pa with effect from
1st January 2024.
The rent is to be increased at 5 yearly intervals with reference to
the Retail Price Index (RPI). The RPI calculation is to be carried
out at the end of the year 2023 to establish the amount of rent
payable with effect from the 1st January 2024.
A memorandum will be endorsed on the lease recording this
review.
If you have any queries, then please contact Fiona Williams who
will be happy to provide further information.
Wards affected: Castle;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden
Decision Maker: Assistant Director: Assets and Property
Decision published: 31/01/2024
Effective from: 30/01/2024
Decision:
To approve the reviewed rent of the above
property leased to South Eastern Power Networks plc (UKPN).
In accordance with the provisions of clause 5 of the lease dated 25
March 2014, the passing rent of £392pa has been reviewed, and
it is proposed to increase it to £520pa with effect from 1st
January 2024.
The rent is to be increased at 5 yearly intervals with reference to
the Retail Price Index (RPI). The RPI calculation is to be carried
out at the end of the year 2023 to establish the amount of rent
payable with effect from the 1st January 2024.
A memorandum will be endorsed on the lease recording this
review.
Wards affected: Stoke;
Lead officer: Marieke van der Reijden