Agenda item

Lead Councillor Question Session

A question session with the Lead Councillor for Economy.  Councillor John Redpath’s areas of responsibility include: Economic Development, Social Enterprise, Rural Economy, Heritage and Community Assets, Customer Service including Web Services.

Minutes:

The Chair welcomed the Lead Councillor for Economy and reminded the meeting of Councillor John Redpath’s areas of responsibility: Economic Development; Social Enterprise; Rural Economy; Heritage and Community Assets; and Customer Service including Web Services.  The Chair indicated that customer service would likely be the focus of questions for the Lead Councillor for Economy.

 

During the ensuing discussion with the Lead Councillor a number of points were made, and responses offered:

 

  • In reply to a request for the priorities for each area of his portfolio, the Lead Councillor for Economy outlined the achievements of the Council’s Economic Development team over the past year, including the distribution of several government grant schemes.  The Lead Councillor for Economy stated that the connection of rural homes and businesses to highspeed broadband was a priority.  With reference to the heritage and community assets element of his portfolio, the Lead Councillor for Economy indicated that options for the future of the heritage service were being prepared.  The Lead Councillor for Economy advised the Committee that he favoured an accessible museum located in one of Guildford’s new town centre developments. 

 

  • The Committee was informed by the Lead Councillor for Economy that customer services was the most challenging area of his portfolio.  He linked the deterioration in the customer service at the Council to cuts to the Council’s funding by government and advised that the Future Guildford transformation programme had introduced a single team of twenty-one staff to handle customer enquiries to the organisation, with seventy-five percent of queries handled online.  The Lead Councillor for Economy indicated that difficulties staffing the customer service team and insufficient options online were responsible for a shortfall in customer service at the Council.  He advised that key performance indicators for the Council’s customer service were made available to the public and discussed at the Corporate Governance and Standards Committee. 

 

  • The Lead Councillor for Economy indicated he had somewhat limited involvement in social enterprise projects. 

 

  • A member of the Committee suggested that, even accepting funding issues and the changes introduced by the Future Guildford transformation programme, there had been a rapid deterioration of Guildford’s customer service, to such an extent that the Council was now ranked very low in terms of its customer service.  Councillors advised the Lead Councillor for Economy that they were using their own MyGuildford accounts to report constituents’ issues and questioned whether there were plans for a version of the MyGuildford portal for Councillors.  In reply, the Lead Councillor for Economy suggested the value in Councillors helping residents to use the Council website and register for a MyGuildford account. 

 

  • With reference to the Council encouraging the transferral of service demand online, members of the Committee questioned whether the Council could do more to aid the provision of sustainable and reliable broadband.  Suggestions were put forward by a member of the Committee that the Local Planning Authority should require provision of broadband to new properties and that the Council should consider involvement in the Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme.  In addition, another member of the Committee suggested the establishment of a social enterprise company to help solve issues around the provision of broadband.  In reply, the Lead Councillor for Economy indicated he would explore the suggestion.

 

  • With reference to the Future Guildford transformation programme, Councillors suggested that Ignite, and consultants in general, had an optimism bias in relation to the public’s willingness and keenness to go online, and that household budgeting cuts might lead to less take-up of broadband, especially by vulnerable residents.

 

  • Councillors questioned how written enquiries, both electronic and paper, were dealt with by the Council’s customer services, and suggested they were handled differently from phone calls.  A member of the Committee asked if residents’ email queries were forwarded on or sent direct to services which no longer had dedicated customer service staff and the quality and timeliness of responses therefore varied.  In reply, the Lead Councillor for Economy indicated that publication of analytics to inform the public of the best times to call customer services was planned.  He indicated that the aim was for customer service staff to answer ninety percent of enquiries themselves.  In addition, the Lead Councillor for Economy offered to update Committee members on how email enquiries were handled by individual services.

 

  • The Lead Councillor for Economy advised the Committee that when customer service became part of his portfolio the customer service team had about ten staff, many not fully trained. 

 

  • In response to a question, the Lead Councillor for Economy indicated he hoped that Guildford town centre businesses would support the continuation of the Experience Guildford Business Improvement District in the upcoming ballot.

 

  • A member of the Committee advised the meeting that the Council responded to queries on Twitter and Facebook quicker than those made by phone or email.

 

  • With reference to an unanswered online enquiry from a resident about a missed food waste collection, a member of the Committee asked if there were Service Level Agreements for responding to such online forms and enquiries.  In response, the Lead Councillor for Economy requested the customer reference number be forwarded to him and asked all Councillors to advise him of such issues. 

 

  • With reference to the request from the Lead Councillor for Economy to be advised of customer service issues experienced by residents, members of the Committee questioned why there was need to advise the Lead Councillor for Economy; they suggested the Council should have a process in place to identify any gaps or patterns of failure in customer service.  A member of the Committee proposed that the Lead Councillor for Economy ensure officers embed processes to seek out and identify customer service issues.

 

  • The Joint Chief Executive confirmed customer service team recruitment was an issue and advised the meeting of the importance of data to progress improvements.

 

  • Several members of the Committee questioned the need for an opt in tick box to get feedback on an issue reported by residents online.  Some Councillors suggested that an opt-in should be the default, while others advised that residents could be legitimately re-contacted with updates on specific enquiries.  The Lead Councillor for Economy confirmed he would progress the matter with officers.

 

  • A member of the Committee questioned whether the customer call centre and online methods were suitable for reporting urgent or emergency issues. 

 

  • In response to a member of the Committee asking if the Council analysed customer demand at its call centre and reception to help identify customer service gaps online, the Lead Councillor for Economy agreed the importance of such an approach and advocated changes to the Council’s online customer service to better identify service demand and further develop the online menu of customer service options.

 

  • Councillors advocated improving the marketing of MyGuildford, the possible value of a targeted direct mail campaign to increase registrations, and banner advertising of MyGuildford on the Council website. 

 

  • In response to a query, the Lead Councillor for Economy explained that residents did not need to be on MyGuildford to use the Council website to report an issue. 

 

The Chair thanked the Lead Councillor for Economy for attending and answering questions.