Venue: Council Chamber, Millmead House, Millmead, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4BB. View directions
Contact: John Armstrong, Democratic Services and Elections Manager Tel: (01483) 444102
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard Smith and from Councillors Dawn Bennett, Geoff Davis, Matt Furniss, Lizzie Griffiths, Stephen Hives, Bob Hughes, James Jones Sandy Lowry, Julia McShane, Danielle Newson, Meryl Rehorst-Smith, David Shaw, Katie Steel, Jane Tyson, Keith Witham and Catherine Young, and from Honorary Aldermen Catherine Cobley, Sarah Creedy, Jayne Marks, Tony Phillips, Lynda Strudwick and Nick Sutcliffe.
|
|
Disclosures of interest To receive and note any disclosable pecuniary interests from councillors. In accordance with the local Code of Conduct, a councillor is required to disclose at the meeting any disclosable pecuniary interest (DPI) that they may have in respect of any matter for consideration on this agenda. Any councillor with a DPI must not participate in any discussion or vote regarding that matter and they must also withdraw from the meeting immediately before consideration of the matter.
If that DPI has not been registered, the councillor must notify the Monitoring Officer of the details of the DPI within 28 days of the date of the meeting.
Councillors are further invited to disclose any non-pecuniary interest which may be relevant to any matter on this agenda, in the interests of transparency, and to confirm that it will not affect their objectivity in relation to that matter.
Additional documents: Minutes: There were no disclosures of interest. |
|
Public participation To receive questions or statements from the public. As this is an extraordinary meeting, any questions or statements must relate only to the business for which the meeting has been convened. Details of any questions (including a written response to them) or requests to make statements received from the public will be set out in the Supplementary Agenda Pack which will be published on the day before the meeting. Additional documents: Minutes: There were no questions or statements from the public.
|
|
Questions from Councillors Details of any questions from councillors (including a written response to them) will be set out in the Supplementary Agenda Pack which will be published on the day before the meeting. As this is an extraordinary meeting, questions must relate only to the business for which the meeting has been convened.
Additional documents: Minutes: There were no questions from councillors. |
|
Replacement / upgrade of various car park payment equipment PDF 106 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Council considered a report which sought authority to use capital funds within the car park maintenance reserve to fund the procurement and acquisition of new car park payment equipment across all council run car parks.
The Council noted that it currently operated 4 barrier pay on foot car parks, comprising of 13 entry / exit barrier systems and 11 payment machines. These facilities generated £3.3m net revenue and cost around £130,000 to service in 2023-24. However, being 13 years old, the ticketed technology was now antiquated, prone to ticket reading issues, becoming increasingly difficult to service, not particularly customer friendly and limited in terms of the business intelligence it can provide.
More modern ticketless, ANPR equipment was available, which would provide improved customer service, additional flexibility to increase the opportunities to generate additional revenue, future-proof payment provision, improved business intelligence and reduced maintenance issues and costs. The improved service provision could include integration with pay by phone, thereby allowing customers to use pay by phone within the PoF car parks alongside, cash and card payments. Pre-booking of spaces could also be made available, and the management of the season tickets and pre-payment cards would be simplified, relying on whitelists of vehicle registration marks, instead of RFID equipment / readers that needed to be programmed, dispatched etc.
It was considered highly unlikely that it would be possible for the existing PoF equipment to remain serviceable for another 10 years, and if it did fail unexpectedly, a net revenue loss of between £2.0m-£3.0m could be expected during the 6 months that an unplanned procurement exercise might take to complete and implement. In terms of the procurement, the estimated capital cost (of up to £650k) was such that a full procurement exercise would be necessary. The transactional costs and the proportion of payment methods were unlikely to change significantly from the present situation, although there might be some scope to reduce the frequency of cash collections, particularly if pay by phone payments also became possible in the PoF car parks. Servicing and maintenance costs
were also likely to reduce. The newer equipment might be less prone
to issues, particularly as more modern equipment tended to have
fewer mechanical components, so this too could potentially derive
some savings. While 10 years old, the equipment continued to maintain high levels of serviceability. However, over the course of the next few years, issues associated with serviceability and the availability of spare parts were likely to increase.
|